Talk:Project SAINT/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 03:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Section 1;
 * Some context would be required on "National Intelligence Estimate 11-5-57"


 * GOR-170? What do you mean by GOR?


 * Mention "DARPA" in full on the first mention, also mention ARPA in full


 * United States Air Force was over linked


 * Section 1.1; All good
 * Section 1.2;
 * Expand NORAD


 * The third phase of the project included several elements. These included: a powerful main engine; suggest rewording this as "The third phase of the project included several elements such as powerful main engine"


 * Link "surface-to-air missiles"


 * and four cameras to allow its operator to observe; suggest "and four cameras for observation"


 * infrared, gravimetric sensors


 * 12 meters (39 ft), 60 meters (200 ft); abrreviate, use |abbr=on
 * I am unsure of how to implement this, If you wish for it to be 12 m (39ft) I can do that manually. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Go for it. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Cape Canaveral, is over linked


 * within range of one? What is this phrase, suggest explaining in general language


 * Section 1.3;
 * for December of 1962; just "for December 1962"


 * The plan was originally for four SAINT launches -> It was planned to the launch four satellites


 * the then Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, remove "the"


 * Lead;
 * bold "SAtellite INTerceptor"


 * Reference 4; 1963–65; make it 1963–1965, per MOS:DATERANGE


 * Suggest adding an infobox. This is out of GA criteria, just a suggestion
 * Sounds good, would I use a infobox for a military operation, or for a satellite? Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Suggest Infobox research project. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * All images are appropriately licensed
 * External links are good. Suggest archiving them, as a precaution.
 * I don't have much experience with archiving links. Would I just use the Wayback machine and then cite the URL given by Wayback, or is there another way of doing it? Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, do it the same way. Just archive them. Even if they are dead in future, we can use the archives. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * 25% violation, unlikely. If possible rephrase some.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I believe I have fixed all of the issues you have raised, aside from the URL archiving, the infobox and the abbreviation template. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe that is everything. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  12:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Are you ready to pass it as it is right now, or do you feel it needs more work? Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  02:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)