Talk:Project Stormfury

Name
In many of the technical sources, Project Stormfury is often referred to as "Project STORMFURY"; that is, with the "Stormfury" in all capital letters. So, should we rename this to Project STORMFURY and change every mention of Stormfury to STORMFURY?-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss Madeline (talk • contribs)
 * No, I don't think so; though a redirect from the all-caps to here makes sense. From what I've seen of military operations the name tends to be capitalized Operation OVERLORD for example, though the common usage is "Operation Overlord" (both in general and on Wikipedia), and pick any other military operation you likely find a similar story. This seems to be the same thing, so lets follow the same logic and have a redirect from the All-caps to here.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

GA granted
Well descriptive and easy to follow. More information about the reception of the project SF would add to the article. Lincher 03:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC)