Talk:Promenade MRT station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 08:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:   ❯❯❯  S A H A   11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely)
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:   ❯❯❯  S A H A   11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:   ❯❯❯  S A H A   11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely)
 * Pass or Fail:   ❯❯❯  S A H A   11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (2nd opinion given by Berrely)

Comments
 ❯❯❯  S A H A   15:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Paraphrasing not needed. If you want, you can.
 * Remove MOS:ALLCAPS from citations and citations from lead as per WP:CITELEAD.
 * I have removed the citelead.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * Link or describe "kuehs" with a note.
 * Linked it and solved some minor issues.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * Change S$ to US$ using Template:To USD. Keep both currencies, like- S$ abc (US$ xyz).
 * The circle line section starts with "Contract 825". Add more details to it. Same with Contract C902.
 * Hmm, will just adding the context of the station will do? There isn't really much to talk about, as decisions of the station site isn't totally open to us.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * also, you can add this "C825 project" (found it from ref [8].) or just remove the contract number. only the word contract will be sufficient.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   08:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I rather keep the contract number. Contracts by LTA for a certain project have a unique number.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Some citations are not properly formatted. Example - The Straits Times [17]. Add source date, author.
 * Avoid using & as per MOS:&.
 * Avoid one sentence para. MOS:PARA
 * Add platform details for line. Like- Circle line uses Platform A/B/C.
 * in picture captions.
 * Only Bayfront was linked in the lead. Link the whole Bayfront station.
 * Corrected it.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * Add wikilinks once. There are some repetitions.
 * "Circle line Extension" E is in caps.
 * Sorry, my bad. I meant something, and wrote something else. E won't be in caps.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * Does this have to apply to the source titles? Because that's how it is in the sources.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , nope. It's optional for sources (title case or sentence case). more details in MOS:ALLCAPS.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * Previous names not mentioned in the body.
 * ✅ Well, I already brought up the working name, and the eventual decision on Promenade.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * "The station is located near ..." add this in the body with ref.
 * Is platform B linked with circle line?
 * Yes it is.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Then I would suggest swapping the platform B image with the Exit A image.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   07:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Need more station details in the body. Bicycle facilities, Platform levels.
 * Can't really specify; no official sources on these. Removed some details as unsourced. Rather leave in the infobox.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Reference needed for Parking, Bicycle facilities, address.
 * More details about PHUNK.
 * ✅ Added link.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Is platform B linked with circle line?
 * Yes it is.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Then I would suggest swapping the platform B image with the Exit A image.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   07:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Need more station details in the body. Bicycle facilities, Platform levels.
 * Can't really specify; no official sources on these. Removed some details as unsourced. Rather leave in the infobox.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Reference needed for Parking, Bicycle facilities, address.
 * More details about PHUNK.
 * ✅ Added link.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * More details about PHUNK.
 * ✅ Added link.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Also added details on the artwork background, from a CCL AiT book.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)