Talk:Propaganda and psychological warfare in the Gaza Wars

Original Research and non-neutrality
First of all, the article is original research, it combines different sources but lacks to demonstrate encyclopedical value. The article is rather a political propoganda. Secondly, the article tries to demonise Hamas and "clear" Israel of any accusations, needless to say that section on Israel has absolutely no critisism. --  Jim Fitzgerald   post  17:03, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)