Talk:Proposed 1893 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom

Untitled
This statement may constitute an unverifiable viewpoint: "The Queen, in an attempt to draw the U.S. into the crisis..."

"Reportedly"
I propose to remove the word "reportedly" from the following sentence in the Background section:
 * The Queen received petitions, reportedly in the thousands, to issue a new constitution as Kamehameha V had done in 1864 (the Constitution of 1864).

It is followed by an inline citation that reads:
 * Liliuokalani (2016) [1898]. Hawaii's Story by Hawaii's Queen. Arcadia Ebooks. Chapter 38, "Hawaiians Plead for a New Constitution". It was estimated by those in position to know, that ... six thousand five hundred ... had signed these petitions.

The citation makes 'reportedly' an unsupported attribution per WP:AWW.Te Karere (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kingdom of Hawaii which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Tarr, G. Alan -- no such reference exists
I believe the correct reference is to Ann Feder Lee, but I'm not sure that citation backs up everything written in the paragraph.