Talk:Prosecution's

from VfD:

The use of 's as a suffix to prosecution is nonsensical.

rturus rturus 23:11, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't. For example: The prosecution's case is compelling. However, it is completely inappropriate as an article title, which ought to be prosecution (which currently redirects to criminal law). Anyhow, delete this as a dicdef. transwiki this to Wiktionary as it is a dicdef. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 03:11, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: The use of the apostrophe s for a plural suffix is nonsensical. I'm going to make a wild bet that Wiktionary already has a definition for "prosecution" and doesn't need the transwiki, so just delete.  ("Warning: Prosecutors Will Be Violated!")  Geogre 03:44, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I made the same guess but decided to go look, and Wiktionary actually does not have a definition for prosecution, which is why I changed my vote. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 04:47, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Really? Wow.  I am very surprised.  BTW, I think User:R. fiend is right:  this could/should redirect to Prosecution. Geogre 14:17, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Any reason this can't be a simple redirect to Prosecution? -R. fiend 07:50, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I think the text of the page would be extremely suitable as part of a Wiktionary entry for "prosecution".  rturus 14:55, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion