Talk:Prosopon

WP:NPOV
The article is disproportionate to two heretics like Theodore of Mopsuestia and his disciple Nestorius that are wrongly presented as "Antiochene Christologists". Their allocutions are not so encyclopedically relevant to understand the true theological meaning of the Greek word Prosopon.

The WP article needs to be corroborated with a more solid description of the history of the notion in the Christian Patristics as well as in the Ecumenical Councils. The current article gives a minimum concern for both of them.Philosopher81sp (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Self-Link? Remove or Create New Article?
The word dyoprosopic near the end of the article links back to the same article.

Either that link should be removed or a new article expounding that term should be created.

1.146.187.2 (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

-physitism vs -prosopic?
Is there a meaningful difference between the two? Such as monophysitic vs monoprosopic- those seem to refer to the same concept.

These two sources seem to refer to the same concept with the differing words, but I'm not certain. If the terms do in fact refer to the same concept, this should be mentioned in both articles (Christology seems the primary one for -physitism, with various -physitism articles and Prosopon for -prosopic), and the theories in this article can be linked to their -physitism counterparts.

https://slife.org/christology/ https://www.biblestandard.com/uploads/2/1/4/9/21496142/e13_-_samuels-kings-chronicles_[web].pdf

TypistMonkey (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)