Talk:Prospect High School (Saratoga, California)


 * I've semi-protected this page for a few days due to extensive vandalism. Shimgray | talk |

Assessment
I have assessed this article as Stub / Low. A good stub with basic information about the school. Needs expansion to cover more topics such as campus, policy and curriculum with full references and citation. Camaron1 | Chris 14:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Is this still a stub? Groverrohan (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

no need to this school is so crappy that this school shouldn't even have a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GayGuyWarren (talk • contribs) 22:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Ummm, Prospect's mascot isn't the vampire beaver, and Admiral Ackbar never went to Prospect and what's all about Prospect being mistaken as a detention center. Failureatdeath —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC).

Fixed Spam--FailureAtDeath (talk) 23:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

December 2012 Re-assessment
I am assessing this article as Start and keeping its importance as low. The article is now more than a stub, but needs further improvement to obtain a higher rating. For more ideas on what sections could be included, have a look at the Wikiproject Schools article guidelines. Thanks, GlanisTalk 09:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Bias
This article seems like it's written as an advertisement, especially in the "Athletics" and "Academics" sections. I could be wrong though.--Spyridon10 (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I agree with the above. This should be worded to be more informative and less promotional. Much of it might be taken directly from the school website, or written by Prospect staff. Systemic bias? Mrprgr (talk) 01:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

The place underwent dramatic social changes given its age, and also radical change in the composition of staff, their values, and priorities. This was an inevitable, reflecting the de-industrialization of the Bay Area and the loss of many of its foundational institutions and myths. A story that complex cannot be covered in an small article. I am surprised at 1) the acidity of the remarks here, 2) the fact that the neutrality tag was put without any justification or reference, and 3) the avoidance of the reality that the narrative here is typical of entries for schools all over wikipedia. Let those who put the bias tag either 1) remove it or 2) justify it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.43.236.4 (talk) 23:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)