Talk:Proteogenomics

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wbacius.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dgary0202. Peer reviewers: OviniW.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Suggestions for editing
1. A short summary for other peptide sequencing methods can be given

2. Some formatting errors can be corrected. (Eg: Loss of the period in line 2, not capitalizing the first letter in sentence 5, loss of a space in between sentences 3 and 4)

3. A section for advantages and limitations of proteogenomics can be added

4. Methodology section can be improved by including the principle of operation and the theory behind the methodology in a simple manner

5. Some technical terms can be explained more (Eg: gene annotations, six-frame translation) to make the article easier to understand

6. A section can be added for external links

7. A "See also" section can be added

8. More secondary references can be added and cited OviniW (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I suggest putting the applications section after the methods section. That is a more typical layout for a technique article. Also, see if you can get more secondary and fewer primary sources in the applications section. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Reasons for the failure to be upgraded to B class
1. The same reference has been used in two or more places with different numbers (eg: References 1,3,6 and 19 are the same. Also references 5 and 9 are the same. Similar case for references 13 and 16 an for 14 and 18.)

2. References 4 and 7 are not accessible.OviniW (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)