Talk:Proto-Koreanic

Standalone
In the current shape, this page is not really useful. What do you think? Should we redirect it to your recently added section Koreanic languages? Kwami had redirected this page before, but another editor restored it. Or we could split the section out to this page? –Austronesier (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree that this article doesn't contribute any value. A large fraction of it is a misunderstanding of Vovin's spoof about Korean and Paleosiberian languages.  The rest is duplicated in other articles.  None of it is actually about Proto-Koreanic.
 * The Koreanic languages article is of a moderate size, not so long that it warrants splitting, I think. If it were split, the summary we'd want to leave there wouldn't be much shorter than the whole section.  I'd be in favour of re-instating Kwami's redirect.  Kanguole 15:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)