Talk:Protolabs Network

Requested move 18 May 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved to Hubs (company) (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 23:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

3D Hubs → Hubs (company) – Official company name change JeanHubs (talk) 14:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Edited request per nom; see below 162 etc. (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). JeanHubs (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: original proposal was 3D Hubs → Hubs, which has been altered as shown above.  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 02:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Presume the nom means move to Hubs (company), but let's see some evidence please. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Seems clear that a rebrand has happened, support move to Hubs (company). Also, based on OP's username, is there a COI here? 162 etc. (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what is meant by OP and COI? But yes the rebranding has clearly occurred, I am an employee at the company. Is more evidence required other than 3dhubs.com redirecting to hubs.com and the edits that have already been made to the current 3D Hubs wiki page? We would preferably like the page to be moved to "Hubs" but if this is not possible then "Hubs (company)" will suffice. JeanHubs (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * When a company employee is involved with the editing of an article, disclosure of the conflict of interest (COI) is required. See WP:COI and WP:DISCLOSE.  162 etc. (talk) 15:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose "Hubs" is a generic term, which this company does not take precedence of. Might consider a move to Hubs (company) if it is shown that is the WP:COMMONNAME in independant sources. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose move to Hubs; support move to Hubs (company) --Zac67 (talk) 16:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose no way this is the primary topic for 'hubs' but maybe move to "Hubs (compamy)"—blindlynx (talk) 19:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support move to Hubs (company) JeanHubs (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC) This !vote was made by the OP; I have instead updated the original proposal, as the nominator should not vote. 162 etc. (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose original move, support move to Hubs (company). Original suggested target is too general. J I P  &#124; Talk 09:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)