Talk:Proud Prophet

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LandonSherwood, Josh.Brown0790, ChisumStuckey, Slangley111.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lbenne, GravityActually.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Almost entire article based on Bracken's analysis of it?
I'm wondering if that makes the article qualified for the single source template. I'm particularly concerned that Bracken makes a number of bold statements about the wargame's outcome but the outcomes and the timeline of the scenario listed in the report has not been declassified. I'm doubtful Bracken would still be a free man if he had used classified information to write his book which make me suspect his statements are bogus. 118.211.44.190 (talk) 04:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I've been reading through the article and I agree with this three year old take on the matter. Some very bold statements are made despite the fact the exercise is still very classified. I'd like to clean it up myself but that's a pretty serious endeavour. Kylesenior (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)