Talk:Proven (company)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Wikipedia states that "an organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it."

Proven has received coverage from the San Jose Mercury News, Forbes, and TechCrunch. These are just the references mentioned in the article. I purposely left out coverage from CNN, Business Insider, and others because I thought that would seem too much like a lack of neutrality.

Is there advice on how to submit a page for Proven without it being deleted? Is it just not popular enough yet? I really tried to follow all the submission guidelines.

Thanks for your help,

Matt

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I have removed the one reference that was not in line with the guidelines, replacing it with two credible outside references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattseacino (talk • contribs) 18:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)