Talk:Proximedia Group

Sgovaert is biased as she works for Proximedia. The sources cited in the article that Sgovaert likes to see removed are relevant. Please refrain from further vandalism. Menutoets (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

I changed Menutoets text because it was biased, cited irrelevant sources and gave partially incorrect information. I do not consider this as vandalism. The current text gives a neutral description of Proximedia's sales tactics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgovaert (talk • contribs) 11:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Sgovaert vandalizes this wiki by removing information that she'd not like others to know about Proximedia. Menutoets (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

I work for this company, but I really tried to make this page as neutral and commercial-free as possible. If you have any ideas how we can make this page even more encyclopedic, please let me know. S.G.Sgovaert (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Sale tactics and lawsuits
This section was removed as a result of an edit war between Proximedia employees and me.

There are a lot of websites, forums and blogs that warn for Proximedia. This is because of the long duration of the contract, the the inability to terminate the contract and the alleged agressive approach of Proximedia and the alleged low quality of service that Proximedia offers. Also, there are a lot of lawsuits every month, some of wich are customers that wish to terminate the contract, others that allege Proximedia of misguiding.

Some of the many, many Dutch lawsuits involving Proximedia:

I think that this is of encyclopedic value, especially if a list of the services that Proximedia is claiming to offer is of enough encyclopedic value to have it on Wikipedia.

Menutoets (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Without objection since 2014. I've placed the text pack on the page. --2A10:3781:26A9:1:4753:5F79:DE4D:3066 (talk) 01:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)