Talk:Pseudo-Brocardus

Contested deletion
I have expanded the article, which makes G5 inapplicable now. Also, the subject itself is notable so deleting this didn't make sense even before my cleanup & expansion regardless of who started it. --Maleschreiber (talk) 00:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)


 * There is no Burcard. There is an anonymous text that has been attributed to Burchard of Mount Sion (and others). I created an article on the text without realizing this page existed. Since no article links here (nor should), there was no point in trying to merge it right away. The page history remains. The title, in fact, should redirect to Burchard of Mount Sion. The content could be merged to the new page. Srnec (talk) 05:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not necessarily opposed to a merge, but the consensus is that Guillaume Adam is the person behind "Burcard". What I'm not sure about is whether the article should refer to the text or to the name of author.--Maleschreiber (talk) 05:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * My idea at the time of cleanup, although I never had the time to follow through was to rename the article to Pseudo-Brocardus because it seems to be a keyword used in many of the 21st century publications about the subject.--Maleschreiber (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The text is anonymous and there is no point tying it unnecessarily to pseudonyms or speculations. I will merge this article to the new article, since it is an orphaned coatrack anyway. I have in the meantime moved it to a more appropriate title as you suggested. Srnec (talk) 04:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)