Talk:Psilocybe allenii/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 05:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

rev  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  05:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Very nice! In taxo, sentence "However, DNA sequencing revealed a 5-base pair change in the ITS regions between P. cyanescens and the Seattle collections.", let's give internal transcribed spacer a more informative lay pipe than "ITS". ;)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  09:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Done, and I also glossed an explanation for any visiting molecular phylogenetic neophytes. Sasata (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Cool! ;)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  09:13, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Psilocybe allenii passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Thanks Rcej! Sasata (talk) 14:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)