Talk:Psychochemical warfare

Review
I think that this article is close to a B class. It only needs a couple more citations (where I've tagged) and I think it will be a B class. Once these are done, if you want another assessment, please go to WP:MHA and place the article name in the list and someone will review it again. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Expansion ideas
Have these every been used in combat? Are they legal under international law? -- Beland (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't personally know if they've been used, but they'd be illegal as they are chemical weapons. 96.55.192.119 (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Fringe element
FYI, I have posted a query on this article at WP:FTN. Some of the content seems unrelated to the "psychochemical" aspect, and some of the sourcing seems inappropriate. Alexbrn talk 12:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know about fringe, but from a quick read of the article, I agree with alexbrn that sourcing and focus of the article could be a bit better. It very much seems like an article that has a place in WP.  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * From the sources I've examined, they are typically either being misused to support a POV or sidetrack into off-topic OR. The section on Cold War seems to be a WP:POVFORK of MK Ultra, but I can't confirm since the sources are largely inaccessible. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)