Talk:Psychoorganic syndrome

Critique for Psychology 101
This article has great potential because of its topic. While it is great to have given the general definition of Psychoorganic syndrome, the article could go on further to discuss it in detail. This is a pin-pointed topic, but it still has a lot of room to stretch. There are numerous things this article could discuss about psychoorganic syndrome. The article could talk about different symptoms of psychoorganic syndrome or about what causes it. It could go on to state whether or not there is any treatment for the syndrome, and if so, what? Is there any research being done about this syndrome? If so, what has been discovered, and what questions still need to be answered? When was psychoorganic syndrome first discovered? How many people does it affect today? Along with answering these questions, this article is also in need of a list or reliable references. Harkiran17 (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I agree on all the facts stated up above about what could of been stated for this article. Since wikipedia is suppose to be a helpful source of information this topic should of been more educating to the readers. Ex: It stated that psyhoorganic syndrome was related to presenile dementia, what is that? The article was poor and could of being more detailed. Sydney lillady (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Sydney Taylor

Duplicate article
The exact same subject is featured at the Chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy article. Aszazin (talk) 11:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Source 3 is not reliable
All the information it supports should be backed up with a reputable source for medical information (eg a journal) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malnu (talk • contribs) 18:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)