Talk:Pteropus brunneus

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Dusky flying fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://epa.qld.gov.au/nature_conservation/wildlife/living_with_wildlife/flyingfoxes/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.amonline.net.au/bats/records/bat8.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090213182559/http://www.amonline.net.au/bats/records/bat8.htm to http://www.amonline.net.au/bats/records/bat8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 21 February 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 17:42, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Dusky flying fox → Pteropus brunneus – The accepted and most common name for this skull and skin, currently residing in a drawer at BMNH. The coded designation in their catalogue is too technical, the variety of common names incidentally applied to the name are ambiguous, misleading, or outright wrong. All article criteria and deference to policy suggests this the only title, as with other possibly or actually extinct taxa. Also not a dusky fruit bat (Penthetor lucasi), fruit bat and flying fox being somewhat synonymous. cygnis insignis 12:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Support' multiple vernacular names. While "dusky flying fox" is somewhat more commonly used than "Percy Island flying fox", the scientific name is far more commonly used than either vernacular name. Both vernacular names were invented by scientists; this is an extinct species known from a single specimens; nobody is communicating about this animal using a vernacular name. Plantdrew (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Expansion
, hey! At random, can you see obvious way that I might expand this article? ~ cygnis insignis 15:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , yeah, it's a tough article since there's just the holotype. I think it looks reasonably complete as is, considering how little we know about it. Enwebb (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks for having a look, I'm a shocker for overlooking the obvi and a second pair of eyes is appreciated. It is interesting to me for that reason, a single specimen, a bit macabre when I think about it. ~ cygnis insignis 14:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)