Talk:Puars

Royalark is not a reliable source
You have been told this several times. If you disagree, you are welcome to try to make a case at WP:RSN. Until then it falls under user-generated content which does not qualify as a reliable source. JanetteDoe (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * RSN have already proclaimed, and not too long ago IIRC. - Sitush (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As it happens, RSN proclaimed with regard to BLPS - see here. I see no reason not to extend it per the general provisions of WP:SPS. - Sitush (talk) 23:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Redirect?
I am tempted to redirect this to Paramara. As has become evident in recent dealings with the creator, and as is apparent from the statement "(alternate version of Paramara, an Indian Rajput clan)", this could easily be dealt with as a redirect. Do I have any support for this? - Sitush (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Regardless of what the outcome of my query may be, I am moving this to Puar now. We do not pluralise titles such as this. - Sitush (talk) 23:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did half the job (renaming the disambig page) but could not complete without getting an admin involved ... and then I forgot about it amongst other things. - Sitush (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)