Talk:Puberty Blues (film)

Two pages
I really think that the book should have the Puberty Blues page and this page should be Puberty Blues (film). The book did come first, after all. -- Katana  Geldar   11:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I have put in the request for it as I think this page is going to get some traffic when the TV series starts. Again, I think the book and film should be seperate pages.-- Katana  Geldar   12:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You have not put in a request. You need to follow the instructions found at WP:RM, to file a proper request -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Oppose move, the film a much more significant in Australia (where both Book and Film originate) KymFarnik (talk) 11:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 18:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Puberty Blues → Puberty Blues (film) – As I said above, I'd like this page to be moved to Puberty Blues (film) and this page to be for the novel. Katana  Geldar   07:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This all depends on the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Generally, the most significant of the three works (the film, the book, and the television series) gets the title. The Godfather may be based on The Godfather (novel), but the film gets the title because it's considered the primary topic.--SGCM (talk)  02:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably better to use Puberty Blues as the disambig page, and the novel, film, anything else about it, can have the (specifier).--Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎  20:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Either way, the book and film deserve separate pages and so does the TV series now.J Bar (talk) 06:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Iconic Australian film, well known to many Australians and, IMO, the majority of people would expect to find an article on the film when they type "Puberty Blues" in the search bar. The same cannot be said of the novel, which does not even have an article, or the 2012 TV series. Jenks24 (talk) 11:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose – There is no article about the novel, so the rationale of the proposal doesn't hold. Among the two remaining subjects, the film is the primary topic. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Puberty Blues. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20121220180451/http://www.signis.net/malone/tiki-index.php?page=Bruce+Beresford&bl to http://www.signis.net/malone/tiki-index.php?page=Bruce+Beresford&bl

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)