Talk:Public Protection Classification Program

Here's what I've got so far if you want to add anything to it. I'd like to push it into article space and have it go live. Maxwellwarner (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * my only comment would be avoid having headings that just have one sentence below them. Instead of:

Membership

 * The department must respond at least four firefighters to structure fires. The chief may account for one of those required positions.

Training
Try this:
 * The department must conduct at least two hours of training every two months for active firefighters.
 * Membership
 * The department must respond at least four firefighters to structure fires. The chief may account for one of those required positions.


 * Training
 * The department must conduct at least two hours of training every two months for active firefighters.

This second alternative will give you:
 * Membership
 * The department must respond at least four firefighters to structure fires. The chief may account for one of those required positions.


 * Training
 * The department must conduct at least two hours of training every two months for active firefighters.

Headings are for big sections. Does that make sense? --Zackmann08 (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Follow up
One additional thing, I would work to get a bit more context in the intro. A good 4-6 sentence paragraph to open the page. I would also find some DOCUMENTED examples of notable departments with ISO ratings. Make sense? --Zackmann08 (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference links are broken
Both references lead to 404s. I tried to find updated versions of the documents, but couldn't find them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ergophobe (talk • contribs) 18:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)