Talk:Public Safety Realignment initiative

Nonpartisan PPIC Study Finding that Realignment Increased Property Crime Should be Mentioned
Dear Wiki's

The nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California found that realignment has increased property crime in California. (http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/rb/RB_1213MLRB.pdf)

This should be mentioned under the Consequences and/or Criticisms section of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSBAA (talk • contribs) 01:09, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 24.7.151.23 (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Agreed. So fix it!  KDS 4444  Talk  08:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Flagged for neutral point of view
This article seems to present opinions as facts. Most notably in the introductory paragraph: "it simply shifts the burden onto county jails; it does not solve the problem of overcrowding in the prison system." Muffinator (talk) 03:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I edited the cited sentence (I wasn't signed in). let me know how it looks now. I think there could be more done to balance the article, but it is pretty informative. Rakejooney (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Rakejooney: I also read over this article, and it definitely warranted an NPOV tag. I have now re-written the entire intro to the piece, being careful to present its basic facts in a neutral tone— I think I have met this goal.  Please have a look and consider removing the NPOV tag if you think so too (but not unless you do!!).  Ping me with any thoughts or concerns.  Thanks!  KDS 4444  Talk  08:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

California, (the word) should be in the main article title, expand article
The public safety realignment act is a California 2011 law to reduce prison overcrowding. This article is only about the California law so the name of the state should be in the title, What do you think?

I am trying to expand and improve the article. Toandanel49 (talk) 01:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)