Talk:Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack

article about the final report?
Just curious if anyone is thinking about working on a new article to cover whatever is said about the final report? I guess it might be a while before there is any in-depth coverage that we could work from, though ... and I wonder if the New York Times or Washington Post will release anything good enough that would allow us to do a decent job of summarizing its contents? It wouldn't make sense to just cite random articles about this minor thing or that minor thing. Without doing WP:OR and quoting extensively from the report itself, I wonder how it could be done, or if this is worth doing at all? Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I think we should follow the Mueller report model eventually, but as you say, we need RS to digest all of this first. soibangla (talk) 03:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

random links to be integrated into article
I just trimmed the External Links section to URLs that generally talk about the subject, also removing dated links. The rest of the non-general links are posted below, and may be useful to integrate into the body of the article-Classicfilms (talk) 23:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Prepared statement of J. Michael Luttig, June 16, 2022
 * Fake alternate slates of Trump electors for seven states — obtained by FOIA request
 * (MSNBC News; July 29, 2022)
 * (MSNBC News; July 29, 2022)
 * (MSNBC News; July 29, 2022)

Classicfilms (talk) 23:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * "Donald Trump Is Not Above The Law" (The New York Times; August 26, 2022)
 * The Devastating New History of the January 6th Insurrection: The House report describes both a catastrophe and a way forward ― The New Yorker. December 22, 2022