Talk:Public land

Comment
Is land held by other governments in the United States (state, local) not considered "public land"?


 * Yes, land held by state and local governments is typically considered "public land." Pam212


 * Our article currently states that "Those trust lands cannot any longer be considered public lands as allowing any benefits to the "public" would be in breach of loyalty to the specific beneficiaries." This is misleading: at least in Arizona, you can buy a recreation permit, or a hunting/fishing license, which allows you to use State land for those purposes. Pete Tillman (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

It would be interesting to see more about Chinese traditions
The article on Tu Di Gong provides an interesting glimpse of another pattern of thought. The phrase can be taken to mean either "land grandfather" or "public land", I think, and is personified as a minor deity (and his wife) who live among the people and bring them wealth. The importance of Chinese tradition can best be appreciated by a little prowling around with Google Earth, in which thousands of little plots of woodland can be seen scattered uniformly over the Chinese landscape, a truly unique appearance really. Wnt (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Split US Public Lands from rest of article
I think it would be better to split off the sections on United States and make them into a new article. I would leave a small paragraph in this acticle topped off with the link Further information: US Public Land. If there are no objections (and no one makes the change before me), I'll start next week. RoyGoldsmith (talk) 20:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Article globalization needed
The article focuses on the United States and needs additional info regarding the rest of the world, if available. I will tag it as such. -- momo  ricks  20:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)