Talk:Public records

Sex offenders
3607513028@mms.uncc.net

Self-Reference
I removed the following, per Wikipedia policy to avoid self-reference. This seems like the sort of thing that belongs in Wikipedia name space. Skittle 20:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 9i9hyfrxhnjfrdygtyt υὰὴ̯ᾼᾶᾲᾼᾐ —°≥≤≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:8324:3E30:A41F:90E2:3A96:689B (talk) 23:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Public records in the scope of Wikipedia itself
This encyclopedia itself theoretically uses forms of public records in its own right, the user contributions ("contribs") log, article edit histories, and other logs. Although this publicizes pretty much every action that every user and administrator does on Wikipedia, most hold that it is necessary to catch vandalism, maintain order, and make sure that users behave, and is an inherent necessity in having an open-source, freely-editable encyclopedia.

Public Records in the US
I thought that this article deserved a section about public records in the US (particularly about the differences in accessibility by state), so I added one. Any thoughts from others? Phyrne22 20:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

The article seems both deficient and incorrect: There is no mention of First Amendment right to access court records to inspect and to copy, a common law right, which was re-affirmed by the US Supreme Court in Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978). Access to court dockets is listed as governed by the Freedom of Information Act, where in fact it is governed by the First Amendment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.104.7 (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

"The right to access court records is also central to liberty: There is no conceivable way to exercise the Habeas Corpus right, deemed by the late Justice Brennan[8] as "the cornerstone" of the United States Constitution, absent access to court records as public records."

This is a very bold claim, that is not explained in any way. Also no citation is given. Even a google search on the connection between public accessibility of court records and habeas corpus turns up nothing of consequence. I am inclined to believe that it is not only an opinion, but also wrong. 5.199.241.177 (talk) 10:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Historic Perspective
The concept of public records is a key concept to democracy and the rule of law. The article in its current form does injustice to the subject. As only one example: It can be argued that absent court records as public records, the Habeas Corpus right, deemed by the late Justice Brennan as "the cornerstone" of the American Constitution, could not be practiced. It would be worthwhile to cover the origins of the concept and its evolutions as the "common law right to access court records - to inspect and to copy", and the significance of the distinct two rights - to inspect and to copy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.104.7 (talk) 09:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

The definition
The definition currently given at the top of the article is way too narrow to be accurate, and I feel has been made worse by recent edits.

This makes sense as a starting point:


 * The California Government Code defines public records as, “…any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristic.” For example, public records can include, but are not limited to, papers, books, maps, charts, photographs, audiotapes, videotapes, and information stored on a computer. Source.

Agreed?--Elvey (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Controversy
Neutrality of controversy sections seems questionable. Author seems to be arguing that data mining is beneficial. 90.157.234.124 (talk) 13:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Public records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070803205616/http://198.187.128.12/colorado/lpext.dll?f=templates&fn=fs-main.htm&2.0 to http://198.187.128.12/colorado/lpext.dll?f=templates&fn=fs-main.htm&2.0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)