Talk:Publius Furius Philus

name
The vast majority of Wikipedia articles don't use the filial naming system in the title, as it isn't the most common form and thus is less natural to link to. It's used mostly in numismatics and hardcore prosopography, and most articles when distinguishing men of the same name use the more common convention of highest rank (which is usually the consulship). I think this article should be moved to Publius Furius Philus. Would a redirect from Publius Furius Sp.f. Philus then take care of the link problems? Or would each article need to be corrected individually? It would be worth doing. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:29, 23 October 2009 (UTC)