Talk:Pujita Ponnada

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * PujitaPonnda.jpg

Change in profile but it's wrong information
Hi this page shows spouse name it's wrong information and it's rumor I want to delete in google its not happening. How to resolve it Kandesrikanth (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Your edits don't appear to be putting in wrong information. Instead, you put a link to IMDB, which an illegal callout and ref to a film review page, which is illegal as a reference type.   scope_creep Talk  18:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2019
Please remove spouse AnonymousPersons5 (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Done, by – Thjarkur (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Birth year
I have restored the sourced content regarding the birth year of the subject which was repeatedly removed by  without explanation. I have tried to settle the issue at the user's talk page, but they are unresponsive as their version is standing. Hence, reverting to status quo. Regards --Ab207 (talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , WP:DOB says "on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it." We are not displaying her birthdate but only the year, so its consistent with the policy. It cannot be said that the subject objects inclusion of her birthdate, as the source mostly contains their own interview. --Ab207 (talk) 19:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * We crossed wires as I was responding to another talk page post you made to . Navigation popups led me astray in this case as I thought the template was the standard as opposed to  . I would not have reverted if I had not misread the dif, however, it's still only an estimated birth year based on one source and is borderline at best. I would err on the side of caution and not include it until there is additional sourcing, but will stand back as the protecting admin as it's more of an editorial issue as opposed to a BLP policy concern at this point.--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, Now I have seen the comment on Cyphidbomb's talk, and trying to make some sense out of it. I'll check if there are any additional sources which report her birthdate. There's also a past discussion about how the particular source is updated which can be seen here. Thanks --Ab207 (talk) 19:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * And we again crossed wires. Hopefully my message above clarifies things a bit.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the response! It didn't occur to me that you've come from Cyphidbomb's talk (I thought the other editor has reported at ANI or something), else I would have limited the discussion to one talk page. But yeah, things are somewhat clear now.--Ab207 (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)