Talk:Puli (2015 film)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2015
release date: 17.September 2015

Rejiking25 (talk) 00:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2015
Hi, Some idiot has updated this movie is a remake of the film Willow which isn't true.

Danny Selvaraj (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2015b
change the line from: "The film is scheduled to be released on 1 October 2015." to: "The film is released on 1 October 2015."

Meenu Aries (talk) 10:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - Nirinsanity (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2015 c
Puli movie got below average review responses from critics  


 * Yes check.svg Done - Nirinsanity (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2015 d
got mixed to positive reviews

Rvanchi1899 (talk) 17:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you can provide a reliable source for a positive review, I will change it. - Nirinsanity (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Judging by the sources, I would actually say mixed to negative reviews. Stickee (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2015
Shruti Haasan named in puli is Pavalamalli/Malli

Cast

 * Vijay as Maru Dheeran & Puli Vendhan
 * Sridevi as Princess Yavanaraani
 * Sudeep  as Thalapathy Jalatharangan
 * Shruti Haasan as Pavalamalli/Malli
 * Hansika Motwani
 * Prabhu
 * Nandita Swetha
 * Vijayakumar
 * Thambi Ramaiah
 * Aadukalam Naren
 * Imman Annachi
 * Robo Shankar
 * Sathyan
 * Vidyullekha Raman
 * Jasper
 * Gayathri Raman

219.92.219.116 (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.
 * According to http://www.hindustantimes.com/movie-reviews/puli-review-vijay-s-fantasy-drama-is-a-fantastic-flop/story-rZTyaq7YZBPxhTfNGzI0DM.html the current version is correct. --Stabila711 (talk) 07:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2015 b
I need to add this in the content. "The film is an official remake of the Hollywood film Willow (1988 American fantasy film)".

Btrex 07 (talk) 09:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.
 * Do you have a reliable source that links the two movies together? --Stabila711 (talk) 09:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2015
Arshad7713 (talk) 11:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC) If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ". Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 12:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: as you have not requested a change.

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2015
Copypaste of entire article removed

Samjinellolapaikayil (talk) 15:57, 5 October 2015 (UTC) "Please don't copy the entire article into the request. If you copy the entire article into the request, you'll break navigation on the talk page, and another editor may remove your entire request." This is not a "spot the difference competition" If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ". Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ - As it clearly states in the instructions to submit an edit request:-

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2015
Puli's 20 days collection is 89.85 CRs but it is not specified at the box office reports it is only written 89.85 CRs and people may misunderstand that the total collection is 89.85 Crs, so I request to edit and write down 20 days collection is 89.85 CRs.

118.200.14.2 (talk) 11:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

[Http://www.futurefunda.com/2015/10/24/puli-24-days-total-collection-24th-day-box-office-report-4th-weekend-box-office-report/ Puli 24 Days Total Collection 24th Day Box Office Report 4th Weekend Box Office Report] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.101.234.243 (talk) 11:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: The total is based on the most recent reliable source. It is understood that the total will increase over time. Unfortunately I am not able to make heads or tails of the Future Funda link you provided. The best I could understand was "Puli movie 24 days Total Collection is around Rs. 56 Crore." which appears to be a lower total than the current source. -- ferret (talk) 01:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2015 b
Chellan Nimesh (talk) 17:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: It's not clear what change you want to make. -- ferret (talk) 00:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2015
http://www.futurefunda.com/2015/10/24/puli-24-days-total-collection-24th-day-box-office-report-4th-weekend-box-office-report/

87.101.234.243 (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done:It's not clear what change you want to make. -- ferret (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

has puli reached 100 crore?
Puli was taken off from almost all theaters at the end of first week.then how come such an utter flop movie becoming a box office hit without even running.(PLEASE CHECK FOR OFFICIAL CONFIRMATION) Athulnandu (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ It's not clear what change you want to make. Please provide references and phrase your request in the form of "Please change X to Y". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

puli's collection according to ibtimes "101.9crs"is fake based mainly on blogs created by fans & have no official confirmation!the official confirmation says 71crore+
Vijay had officially confirmed that THERI is his 3rd movie after THUPPAKKI & KATHTHI to cross 100crore mark.refer(www.sifymovies.com/www.moviezreview.com/www.scooptimes.com/www.twitter.com/VIJAY'S THIRD ENTRY TO 100CRORE CLUB. check ibtimes report in december- they have reported exactly the same fake records of" 101.9 Crores "with same share given by blogs & fan pages on October month. Athulnandu (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ It's not clear what change you want to make. Please provide references and phrase your request in the form of "Please change X to Y". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

the producers confirmed puli as above 71 crore grosser & has made a loss of 50 crores
Puli producers officially confirmed puli as 71 crore grosser at 14 Oct and has almost taken away from all major centers(www.instead.com/www.moviezreview.com/www.campusindia.in).but the 100crore buzz created by blogs & fanpages still do not have any official confirmation.only ibtimes reported the unofficial records in unofficial records.PLEASE ALLOW ONLY OFFICIALY CONFIRMED REPORTS IN WIKIPEDIA. Athulnandu (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ It's not clear what change you want to make. Please provide references and phrase your request in the form of "Please change X to Y". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

theri becomes 3rd movie of vijay to enter 100crore club after thuppakki & kaththi.
Theri crossed 100crore in just 6 days.Earlier vijay's thuppakki & kaththi too have grossed 100crs worldwide and theri is the 3rd film of the actor to town the 100cr magical figure(title=theri joins 100cr club/www.sifymovies.com)/www.moviezreview.com/www.scoop times.com/www.Hindustantimes.com)"ENOUGH PROOF THAT PULI'S STUNNING 101.9 CRORE IS FAKE" Athulnandu (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ It's not clear what change you want to make. Please provide references and phrase your request in the form of "Please change X to Y". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@Athulnandu hope this source satisfies you puli also comes under 100 crore films http://www.ibtimes.co.in/mersal-box-office-collection-vijay-crowned-king-rs-100-crore-club-consistent-performer-749164 Bothiman (talk) 10:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

This movie not even grossed 70 crore
This movie's theatrical rights sold for 72 crore worldwide but it had given worldwide share of only 45 crore, an industry disaster by incurring loss of more than 60% to the distributors. Lumbercane (talk) 02:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And we're supposed to do what, take your fabricated figures over what's been published? How did you wind up with the correct figures for the film, figures that seem to have escaped the mainstream news outlets? Rhetorical questions, since we only care what reliable published sources say. Currently, the box office figure is attributed to Andhra Box Office, which is not a great reference, since it's a faceless blog, but it's all we have at present. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Too much edits on box office? not fair for wikipedia page
Please remove the box office, as there is no reliable box office cite for this movie. And this movie had removed from more than 90% of screens after its first weekend of its release due to it had caused loss for executors on its first week itself, because they had feared that they may suffer losses when this movie had screened. And please don't use Andhra box office cite as it is not a reliable source and no blog's and imdb. Lumbercane (talk) 03:31, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Puli Movie Poster.jpg

Reversion
61.222.202.195, I reverted these edits of yours for a few reasons: Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) You introduced grammatical errors, like "The film's overseas success led to International Business Times pointed out that," and "The film was praised for its visual effects better than Rajamouli's"
 * 2) rvcj.com is a blog, and we don't care what blogs think. Further, opinions are not facts. Saying that the VFX is "better" than Baahubali, is an opinion being represented as a fact. (And again, we don't care what blogs think.)
 * 3) "The Tamil Nadu theatrical rights sold for ₹30 crore" is not supported by the reference you added.

Inuyasha
IP user There is no mention of Inuyasha in the link you are adding. Please do not add this content till you find a reliable source for this claim. Discuss on the talk page Venkat TL (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * These IPs are proxies of a banned user, possibly User:Bothiman or User:Daaask. They have used such tactics before in Vijay related articles. User:Cyphoidbomb would know better. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Fylindfotberserk I see. So what to do now? Summarily revert? Venkat TL (talk) 17:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Also the source they provided is WP:CIRCULAR from this article only, thus unreliable, not to mention the site is unreliable as well. This user has a habit of adding unreliable sources and WP:ORs. Should tag someone at WP:ICTF. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)