Talk:Pullman Square

GA comment
Inline citations go directly after the punctuation. Go through the article and fix all occurrences. --Nehrams2020 20:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe all have been taken care of.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

GA Passed

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Infobox
There is an infobox that might work well here: Template:Infobox_shopping_mall. Any thoughts? Justen 10:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This isn't a mall with an anchor or many stores. It is considered more of a district than anything.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Peer review comments
Per comment left at the peer view: General editing help would be appreciated, especially in the Construction and opening sub, where it was recently converted from bullet to paragraph format. I will be doing minor edits to see if it can be managed easier, but sometimes a fresh pair of eyes can be better. I believe I have covered the history of the project extensively, and cannot see it being expanded further unless there are new articles (which appear almost weekly it seems).  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 19:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)