Talk:Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Is
Is the last sentence actually relevant, or does in need to be explaned better? 130.11.43.246 19:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC) It definitly needs to be explained. I am in the field and dont understand what that sentance is reffering to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.166.116.221 (talk) 19:29, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

An introductory sentence (i.e. "PFGE is....") would be tremendously helpful.

In my opinion, the small theory paragraph that's attributed to "Dr Saleh Mutahar Y. Oth" doesn't say anything that isn't said in the rest of the article, and doesn't say it clearer: I reckon it should just be deleted. 131.111.46.14 (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yup, consolidating now. Can anyone refute/support the claim by Dr. SMYO that "the theory of pulsed field electrophoresis is a matter of debate"? I may remove it; I'll certainly deprofilise it... Geno-Supremo (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Introducing Editors
I'm Mahdis, a Moleular biology & Genetics student who is dedicated to improving knowledge on Wikipedia by editing and updating various topics. Mahdis.tagh (talk) 19:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)