Talk:Puncheon Run Connector/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * What is a surface intersection?
 * Reworded.  Dough 48  72  19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "development" - either be more specific, or remove it entirely.
 * Clarified.  Dough 48  72  19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What does DelDOT stand for?
 * Defined abbreviation.  Dough 48  72  19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What about the city of Dover not liking the proposal? That seems significant, doesn't it?
 * Added.  Dough 48  72  19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not a requirement for GA, but the picture is a bit dark.

On hold. --Rschen7754 05:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments.  Dough 48  72  19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Passing. --Rschen7754 20:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)