Talk:Pure-tone audiometry

Untitled
Article created by PTApete&co on User:PTApete&co/Pure tone audiometry and then moved here to allow it to go live. SilkTork 18:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Off-Topic?
I'm of the opinion that much of the discussion of the mechanism of hearing on this page is off-topic, and shoulod probably go into the general hearing page. Should possibly be replaced by a discussion of the variants of PTA (play adiometry, VRA, BOA) instead? I'm probably going to go ahead with this unless there are some big arguments against it, feel free to let me know if you think it hsould go back the way it was. Forsakendaemon (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree. Everything from section Cochlea on down belongs variously in Hearing, Cochlea, Auditory system, Sensorineural hearing loss, or Psychoacoustics articles.  The dead region stuff is illustrated by tympanograms, so maybe that stuff goes under tympanometry.  It explicitly states that PTA does not detect dead regions, so doesn't belong here.  In deficiencies, no representative audiograms resulting from PTA are shown.  A large section on interpretation of PTA audiograms in terms of hearing loss (extent - mild, moderate, severe, profound, and type - conductive, sensorineural, central processing, etc) should accompany those.Sbalfour (talk) 19:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pure tone audiometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120323233119/http://www.thebsa.org.uk:80/docs/RecPro/PTA.pdf to http://www.thebsa.org.uk/docs/RecPro/PTA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)