Talk:Purple-crowned fairywren

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Purple-crowned fairywren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mpg.de/1028786/W001_Biology-Medicine_062_067.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Nearly GA
this article i think is nearly good as other fairywren article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cebu Flowerpecker (talk • contribs) 23:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think it's a good GA nom, just needs a bit of work in the Taxonomy and systematics section. AryKun (talk) 03:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * There are a lot of reference errors at the moment. MeegsC (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * are those reference errors in the "Taxonomy and systematics" section, or found throughout the article? -Darouet (talk) 17:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I mean in the actual reference section. There are plenty of red error messages showing there which should be cleaned up before it gets the stamp of approval. MeegsC (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks — fixed! -Darouet (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * can you see all the "Cite journal requires |journal=" messages? Those should be fixed too. My guess is that someone has put the journal name into the wrong parameter. MeegsC (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not getting those errors, but I do see when I check carefully that some "cite journal" instances had used the "publisher" instead of the needed "journal=" param. I've fixed that now - let me know if you get any more errors. Not sure why I'm not seeing them... -Darouet (talk) 23:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I did the remaining trio. They were "|Journal=" rather than "|journal=" and apparently that's enough to make the cite journal template ignore them! Insert eyeroll here. ;) MeegsC (talk) 23:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks for that! -Darouet (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

I have added an extra section under the "taxonomy" header, called "evolution," and it appears that Arykun you also improved and expanded the taxonomy portion of the article. I think we've all improved the references. In my view this article passes GA. -Darouet (talk) 17:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it's close! It does need a proper lead though. The lead should summarise the main points of the article, and this one doesn't do that yet. MeegsC (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * fair ... -Darouet (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)