Talk:Purse party

References I plan to use to expand the stub I have started
These are the references I'm planning to use. If anyone else wants to beat me to it, feel free.


 * There's a lot more besides that, e.g., and they seem to be quite an old thing:. I think we can give the author a chance to expand it before we merge into Party plan, as the knock-offs angles does make this kind of party somewhat different to the generic party plan. Apparently it was Sex and the City that set off the latest trend: I'll give a go at rewriting it with sources shortly. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. No rush, I'm generally an eventualist. I favour mergism purely to prevent repetition, and to concentrate efforts. :)
 * I just stumbled across this article whilst trying to learn about the ontology of handbag types, and was familiar with the fucker tupperware party already... ;) -- Quiddity (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Merge Purse party into Party plan proposal
Copied from Talk:Party plan: Merging Purse party into Party plan was proposed. Would also suggest either dropping or referencing purse party's allegations of counterfeiting.

Yes, agree, merge. Pol098 (talk) 15:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, as above. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree on merge.  Leef5  TALK &#124; CONTRIBS 19:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)