Talk:Push–pull converter

Timing logic backwards
It seems to me that having both transistors closed (on) would result in a short across the supply rail? --njh 01:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I think there is some non-standard terminology at work here... the article uses "closed" to indicate a high-impedance (off) state, and "open" to indicate a low-impedance (on) state.

- Dwight Larson


 * There are many problems with this description. They actually describe a full-bridge forward converter, not a push-pull.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.174.111.17 (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
1. A better and more specific image could be used for the circuit. Since the whole transistor operation is explained, then the article might as well have a schematic that shows how the transistors replace the switches in the current image.

2. The "Circuit operation" and "Timing" sections should probably be renamed "Circuit" and "Operation" which I think more appropriate.

ICE77 (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)