Talk:Putney (UK Parliament constituency)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Putney (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Presumptuous
Nest General Election has not been called, so it is presumptuous of the LibDems (and now Labour) (and now the Renew Party) (and now Labour again!) (and now the Greens who will definitely have seen the note about wikipedia policies when they edited)) to enter their candidate. They break Wikipedia policy (see UNDUE, CRYSTAL and NOTBLOG for starters). The Renew Party entry is even more egregious for stating that their candidate may not even stand. Refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Berwickshire,_Roxburgh_and_Selkirk_(UK_Parliament_constituency) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.185.122 (talk) 07:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)