Talk:Pyrmont Bay ferry services

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Darling Harbour ferry services. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.transportnsw.info/resources/documents/timetables/F4-darling-harbour.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Darling Harbour ferry services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304024829/http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/b2b/inquiries/walker-ferry-report.pdf to http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/b2b/inquiries/walker-ferry-report.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150412182709/http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/content/sydney-ferries-fleet-facts to http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/content/sydney-ferries-fleet-facts

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Merger proposal October 2020
I propose to merge Pyrmont Bay ferry services (the "upcoming F4") into this article ("past F4" prior to 2017) and rename the article to Pyrmont Bay ferry services ("combined article"), for a number of reasons:
 * Both F4 routes are almost similar, if not identical
 * Both titles are confusing, you do not know which one is which unless you read the lead paragraph or infobox. I have already placed an "about" tag at the top of each article.
 * There is no table of wharves in the past F4 article. The table in the upcoming F4 article can be placed before the length prose-y "History" section in the combined article.
 * The "Service" section in the upcoming F4 article is empty anyway.
 * The "Service" section in the past F4 article is largely unreferenced (about the fleet used). These may be removed to cut down length.
 * The outcome of the combined article will be similar to Airport & South Line, which talks about pre-2013 Airport and East Hills Line and the current T8 line, both of which are identical in route.

Marcnut1996 (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

I have also pinged users who have contributed content to the upcoming F4 and F9 articles in the last week.
 * Support Fleet Lists (talk) 02:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. Ridiculous and confusing to have two articles. 5910 C (talk) 04:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support I am fine with a merge of the upcoming F4 into this article. BTW, pings do not work without a signature. Techie3 (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Update
I have already merged the content from Pyrmont Bay ferry services into this article. Now, we just need an administrator to perform a page swap. Marcnut1996 (talk) 02:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)