Talk:Pyromania/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Final GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):Does not go into depth b (MoS (Med)): does not follow WP:LEAD
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): insufficient references
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): No
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Yes
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.: Yes
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

-- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)