Talk:Pythagorean tiling/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tessaract2 (talk · contribs) 17:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

I am currently reviewing this or am not at the computer.Almost done! However, I need a second opinion on the copyvio report. Thanks User:David Eppstein for the info! (See below.) Tessaract2 Talk 17:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.

So the copyvio detector has an over 75% confidence, but it seems like coincidence basic info that is needed anyways for most of it. I need another opinion here. Tessaract2 Talk 18:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * User:David Eppstein has told me that it's a reverse-copy situation after I commented on his talk page about it. I think this might end up being a pass! Tessaract2 Talk 19:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Is there anything more you're waiting on from me before completing the review (WP:GA/REV, Step 4)? —David Eppstein (talk) 06:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm all done. I don't know how to close it though. Do I have to do anything after marking it as passed? Never mind.