Talk:Python (programming language)/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. This is certainly one of the better programming language GAs, but I do have a few minor observations:


 * External links should only appear in the External links section. So links like those in Programming philosophy and Alternative implementations should be converted to inline citations.


 * There a couple of clarification tags that need to be dealt with.


 * All citations should include full details, including title, publisher, and last access date.


 * The lead is a little on the short side to adequately summarise the article.

A nice piece of work nevertheless. --Malleus Fatuorum 15:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)