Talk:Pz. Sfl. IVc

Sources Dispute - June 2021
This article cites a link to a Russian-language review of a model of this tank present in a video game (World of Tanks) as the only citation for the entirety of its Specifications section. That is an inaccurate source for information about a real-world armored fighting vehicle. As a result of this bad citation, within the article itself, there are two different engines listed as powering the vehicle. One engine is not cited at all, and the other is backed up by this improper source. This citation should be removed, and all information derived from it needs to be checked against proper historical records. --FlintTD (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Few photographs of the prototypes exist, and it would be good to get copies of them to Wikimedia Commons.
 * Flakpanzer Pz.Sfl.IVc with lowered superstructure.jpg
 * Pz.Sfl.IVc armed with the FlaK37 L56 in Italy during field trials.jpg
 * Pz.Sfl.IVc during field tests.jpg
 * ⸻Nikolas Ojala (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Redoing some stuff from the edits I just reverted
please hold, a lot of stuff was unsourced and some stuff was wrong, page was moved right after so give me a moment to manually redo some things that we're good DynCoder (talk) 12:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The IP keeps fighting over and edit warring. CastJared (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I recommend not continuing the EW by undoing further, as this might get yourself blocked. I have already reported the edit war (as you are aware), so soon enough an admin will step in and likely undo the IP user's changes. DynCoder (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Let's wait for the admin to the pull the IP out. CastJared (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I blocked the IP but in the future please try to engage them without using templates. Put a diff of one of their edits here without a complaint about the IP or edit warring or competence and so on, and say what is wrong with the edit. In your next revert of the IP, put "please see ..." where ... is a link to the section on article talk. Don't bother with that if the edits are clearly junk but this IP seems to be writing coherent text and some of their other edits seem to be correct. Johnuniq (talk) 05:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)