Talk:Q37:35

responding to your comment: making redirects for Quranic verses (e.g.Q37:35). Instead of that I think it is better to externally link verses using Template:Cite Quran where the reader can see multiple translations

For a mulititude of reasons I am currently reading the Study Quran. Below is a typical excerpt.


 * Waxing arrogant is an attitude associated with Satan (2:34; 7:13; 38:74–75) and the disbelievers (14:21; 16:22; 25:21; 28:39; 35:43; 37:35; 40:60; 46:20; 71:7; 74:23), and in several places, as here, waxing arrogant specifically describes the disbelievers’ attitude toward God’s signs as brought by the prophets (7:40, 7:133; 10:75; 23:45–46, 66–67; 39:59; 45:31).

If I were to follow your logic, each Quranic reference on Wikipedia would link to an external website. Why not just use Google and bypass wikipedia all together? In any case they are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to link and use the template:


 * Waxing arrogant is an attitude associated with Satan (2:34; 7:13; 38:74–75) and the disbelievers (14:21; 16:22; 25:21; 28:39; 35:43; 37:35; 40:60; 46:20;  71:7;  74:23), and in several places, as here, waxing arrogant specifically describes the disbelievers’ attitude toward God’s signs as brought by the prophets ( 7:40,  7:133;  10:75;  23:45–46,  23:66–67;  39:59;  45:31).

The external link is currently mega mega dated. This is better although, from my perspective it gives too low a priority to Non-Muslim translations. Wikipedia is best by test. If there is a super web page then yes an external link might be more informative.

JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that a better external site can be used. I like, it has a lot of translations and a nice format. I don't exactly see how you propose to use both internal link and external link. In any case, wikipedia should not necessarily have a translation of every verse of the Qur'an. I have a feeling that users at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not would agree with me.VR talk 14:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 37:35; has both internal link and external link. By all means formulate a comment for Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)