Talk:QAC Quickie Q2

documentation
this is an example of how far standards have fallen in wikipedia. Some pages are edited so strictly that sourced are demanded for every paragraph or few sentences and then there's this page that has practically no documentation and even involves misinformation and gobbledygook. "backside approach". There is no such thing unless you're a surfer. Tell me why I shouldn't delete entire unsouced sections. Jackhammer111 (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * As per WP:V All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. Any material that needs an inline citation but does not have one may be removed. - Ahunt (talk) 23:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)