Talk:QLTM

Proposed Deletion
I do not believe that this article should be deleted based on the criteria of notability. Although not widely used, and therefore not "noteable" by the bot that put this article up for deletion, it is important for Wikipedia to contain information such as this to be more accurate, noteworthy, and complete. As with other non-electronic encyclopedias such as The Encyclopedia Britannica, not all information contained may be noteable to all people, but may be of interest so some users. This only enhances the usefulness of Wikipedia. If QLTM is not noteworthy, then other forms of internet slang that are already part Wikipedia such as "LOL", "OMG" would also not meet the criteria. TETFSU 16:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not a bot. I'm a person.  It might help you to read the notability criteria, so you can offer the reliable sources that would be needed to prevent deletion.  There are plenty of reliable sources cited on the LOL article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)