Talk:QSaltLake

Fair use rationale for Image:Qsl issue07-01-16 01 sm.jpg
Image:Qsl issue07-01-16 01 sm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

This is simply advertising; the article should be deleted.
This is a "public relations piece s designed to promote a company or individual. Wikispam articles are usually noted for sales-oriented language (as in "to generate interest so customers will purchase") and external links to a commercial website." Wikipedia Spam —Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowYouNow (talk • contribs) 20:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I dispute the above characterization of this article as SPAM. As per Wikipedia's notability guidelines, QSaltLake has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The Deseret News and City Weekly, whose coverage is included in this article's external links section, both meet guidelines for WP:RS.


 * Furthermore, QSaltLake itself qualifies as WP:RS -- the newspaper is known for providing reliable, journalistic news coverage.


 * QSaltLake has a similar significance to Salt Lake City's gay community that, e.g., The Bay Area Reporter has to that of San Francisco.


 * Finally, good-faith efforts to resolve this discussion with user KnowYouNow were to no avail: He/she has no profile or talk page. I suggest that this complaint may have more to do with random personal motivations than with a user's concern over encyclopedic integrity.

Rangergordon (talk) 14:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)