Talk:Q (novel)

[Untitled]
re the MQR review of Q, the [*] note contains a broken link. Just in case dr Jost sees this comment. - Anon

I don't understand why, of all the reviews listed below, this one is first among equals, the only one with a comment. Is there any logic to this? - Flavell

equal treatment of reviews
Having read the review by David Liss, it is actually the inclusion of this line in the article that strikes me as "unnecessary and", I suspect, "self-referential."13:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

NovelsWikiProject
I think this thing of "rating" the "importance" of a book is utterly ridiculous. Who decides whether a book is of "high", "medium" or "low importance"? A self-appointed bunch of wannabe literati? And according to what criteria? I smell a stench of cultural discrimination... Leobot 08:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Paperbackq big.jpg
Image:Paperbackq big.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)