Talk:Qila Mubarak

Qila Mubarak: Patiala or Bathinda
-- This source locates the fort in Patiala, but the articles place it in Bathinda (this one and Bathinda) --Kummi (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC) This Source mentioned above is wrong, both are separate entities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.47.196 (talk) 07:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

-- I think the idea to merge this with the article, Qila Mubarak, Patiala is not proper as this fort in Bathinda has an independent existence. arunbandana 16:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunbandana (talk • contribs)

-- Its a different fort at a different place only a stupid would suggest to merge it with patiala fort. do some research before suggesting anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.33.246 (talk) 21:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

-- Qila Mubarak Patiala and Qila Mubarak Bathinda are two seperate forts. Hence articles Qila Mubarak and Qila Mubarak, Patiala can not be merged. 99.179.23.228 (talk) 04:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

it's not the oldest fort of India. India's oldest fort is situated in hanumangarh (Rajasthan)
so please correct it 103.66.8.150 (talk) 17:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)