Talk:Qinggong

Merge
Being the author of the Qing Gong article, I am eager to see the two articles merged, as the Qinggong article is equally well written. Dessydes 15:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merged. --mh 07:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Name
The name of the article is "Qing gong" but its always referred to in the body as "Qing Gong", and then the pinyin is qingging and the yale is... well it doesnt matter cuz no one will use it. my point is, the title should be "Qinggong" and all references in the article should be qinggong. Spelling it Qing Gong is like spelling nothing as No Thing. --1698 21:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually this is a prob with many chinese related articles. I suggest we take a look at Naming conventions (Chinese). -- mh 07:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Pinyin is actually something like ching kung. Definitely not ging though. Dessydes 05:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually the pinyin is, as that guy stated, Qinggong. He probably made a typo when writing "qingging" - i and o are right next to each other. "Ching Kung" would be the old Wade-Giles romanisation, not Pinyin. Also, the article in general lacks any qualification or sourcing of the explanation which seems totally pseudoscientific and unbelievable. Destynova 21:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Qinggong = running on plank
The article begins by telling us a lot about how some fiction is using it wrong and then ends with telling us it's just about running on planks. I'm sure a lot of information was lost on the way and I'm not sure if this is even correct. At least, the complaining about wuxia should be moved below the actual description of qinggong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.110.44.130 (talk) 04:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Can we just delete the running around on planks? I've tried to find 傾功 and there's absolutely nothing on it. Not to mention the Chinese Wikipedia page mentions nothing of it. Iserlon (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)