Talk:Quack Miranda warning

[untitled]
The NLM cite supports the text of the warning, and the fact that it is mandated in boldface. Don't remove it again. Guy (Help!) 23:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The NLM citation does not make ANY mention whatsoever of the term "Quack Miranda". You have no right to demand that it must not be removed.WP:FIXED Nothing on Wikipedia is set in stone.WP:STONE Vitaminman (talk) 22:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Quack Miranda warning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121219142524/http://dietarysupplements.nlm.nih.gov:80/dietary/faq.jsp to http://dietarysupplements.nlm.nih.gov/dietary/faq.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)